News
Qatar bans beer in and around stadiums just two days before the World Cup
Can we seriously just strip them off it and
The Qatari state has reportedly called for a complete ban on beer in and around stadiums just over 48 hours before the start of the 2022 World Cup.
As per The Times, the traditionally dry nation is set to stop the sale and consumption of beer in and around their football stadiums entirely after it was reported earlier on Friday that nearby stalls stocking alcohol would be moved to different locations.
The Gulf nation has strict laws around alcohol as it is, with only designated zones inside fan parks and selected hotels permitted to sell booze, not to mention officially licensed products – i.e. Budweiser – being the only kind available at the games. Now it seems there won’t be any on offer.
This last-minute appeal comes despite Budweiser having a multi-million dollar contract with FIFA and will see the company forced to remove advertising and all other visibility from around the eight different venues hosting the competition.
Budweiser were reportedly told on Saturday, 12 November to relocate the sites selling their products at the stadium complexes to less prominent locations.
Moreover, since the manufacturer’s presence at the tournament is already in the process of being withdrawn, it will now be virtually impossible for fans to buy beer outside of a select few areas.
Prior to the decision, the only place punters could purchase a pint was in the fan parks in the capital of Doha, in specific areas of certain hotels and only in quantities of four pints maximum at any one time. Alcohol is also only available at certain periods during the day.
Whether travelling supporters knew before they set off for the Middle East or not, we also recently learned that should fans be able to get their hands on a cold pint, it will set them back £12 a pop. At least they’re saving a fair few quid now, whether they like it or not.
Read more:
Brewing company AB InBev, who own Budweiser among several other well-known beer brands, previously told Sky News that in the face of these sudden calls to shift their product, “they are working with FIFA to bring the best possible experience to the fans.”
The world’s largest brewer went on to insist, “Our focus is on delivering the best possible consumer experience under the new circumstances”. So much for that idea.
For many fans, this is just yet another stringent regulation further hampering their time at a tournament which really shouldn’t have gone ahead.
While a beer ban sits at the very bottom of the list of everything wrong with Qatar 2022, it still confounds us as to how the country was ever awarded the World Cup in the first place.
For all the latest news, events and goings on in Greater Manchester, subscribe to The Manc newsletter HERE.
Featured Image — Teo Do Rio/Gonzalo Remy (via Unsplash)
News
Stockport man admits to drugging and raping his wife without her knowledge for more than 20 years
Emily Sergeant
A man in his 60s from Stockport has admitted drugging and raping his wife in a ‘horrific’ 20-year campaign of abuse.
According to Greater Manchester Police (GMP), the man – who cannot be identified in order to protect the life-long anonymity of the victim – previously admitted five counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault, six counts of assault by penetration, and one count of sharing intimate photos or film.
And now, during an appearance at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court yesterday (14 September), he pleaded guilty to a further 45 charges.
This makes it 60 charges in total the man has now pleaded guilty to.
Some of the charges he pleaded guilty to yesterday include a further 16 counts of rape, nine counts of assault by penetration, seven counts of sexual assault, and four counts of attempted rape, amongst several others.
Speaking following the court appearance yesterday, GMP’s Assistant Chief Constable, Rick Jackson, said: “Our focus remains on supporting the victim of this horrific campaign of abuse through what is a very complex investigation.
“Specialist support continues to be provided to the victim at the centre of this case.
“If you are concerned you or someone you know may be affected by drug-facilitated sexual abuse, please know that you do not need proof, certainty, or a clear memory to be taken seriously.
“You are not expected to understand exactly what has happened or who was involved in order to be taken seriously. If you feel that something has happened, then please report it or ask for help.”
Read more:
GMP reiterates that anyone who does choose to report sexual abuse does not need a full account or clear memory, can share as much or as little as they feel able, and will be supported by trained officers, as their ‘immediate’ safety and wellbeing will be the ‘priority’.
They may also speak to a support organisation first and decide later whether to involve police.
- Saint Mary’s Sexual Assault Referral Centre – Services are available on a 24-hour basis, and can be accessed by calling 0161 276 6515.
- Greater Manchester Rape Crisis – Call on 0161 273 4500 or email [email protected]
- Survivors Manchester – Call 0161 236 2182.
Featured Image – Robert Cuts (via Flickr)
News
Referees admit Manchester City’s derby-winning goal over Manchester United was a VAR ‘error’
Emily Sergeant
Referees have admitted that Manchester City’s winning goal during yesterday’s Manchester derby was a VAR ‘error’.
In case you didn’t tune into the Manchester derby yesterday – which was held at Manchester United’s home ground, Old Trafford – star striker Erling Haaland’s goal handed Manchester City a 1-0 victory – in the end, even after fellow City player Phil Foden was given a straight red card and sent off in the twenty third minute.
Haaland‘s goal was initially deemed offside on the pitch, before VAR overruled the decision.
New City signing Enzo Fernandez was in an offside position as he attempted to play the ball before Haaland scored.
Fernandez appeared to impact the defending of Manchester United‘s Lisandro Martinez by attempting a diving header, despite not touching the ball.
Following the full-time whistle, United’s manager Michael Carrick said it was ‘worrying’ that the goal was allowed to stand, claiming that there was no ‘grey area’ when it came to determining whether Fernandez had interfered with play.
“It’s worrying if that’s how the game is seen by those who are officiating it,” he commented.
Pundit and former Manchester United star, Gary Neville, also expressed confusion at the decision, declaring on Sky Sports after the game: “I’m going to need the offside law explaining to me, because that has lost me, I have to say. I do think when they look back on this, they will recognise they got it wrong.”
Neville said he thinks that referee Michael Oliver will be ‘nervous’ about the goal yesterday, as will the rest of the officials.
And now, less than 24 hours after the match ended, refereeing body Pro Ref has since made what Sky Sports is calling an ‘unusual intervention by confirming that a review of the goal will take place.
A spokesperson for Pro Ref said in a statement: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement.
Read more:
“A review of the incident will take place.”
Featured Image – Jaleel Akbash (via Unsplash)
Danny Jones -
18th November 2022 
