The final episode of Channel 4’s It’s A Sin has been devastating audiences across the UK since its air online and on our TV screens this past weekend.
And now, one of the show’s stars has explained why it’s so important to today’s society.
It’s A Sin is a five-part drama series, largely filmed in Greater Manchester, created by revered screenwriter and producer Russell T Davies – who is best-known for his work in Doctor Who, Queer As Folk and Casanova, and has also previously set and filmed a number of his other shows in Manchester too, including trilogy series Cucumber, Banana & Tofu in 2015, and Years & Years in 2019 – and it explores the lives of three young gay men affected by the AIDS crisis of the 1980s.
The series is loosely inspired by Davies’ own real-life experiences, who was also an 18-year-old gay man at the start of the AIDS crisis.
The show has a seriously-impressive line-up of up-and-coming talent and big names too, with popstar and actor Olly Alexander leading the series, alongside newcomers Omari Douglas and Callum Scott Howells, and supporting roles coming from veteran actors Stephen Fry, Neil Patrick Harris, Keeley Hawes and Shaun Dooley.
ADVERTISEMENT
Since its air on All4 on 22nd January, and every week on Channel 4 since, the series has exceeded all expectations.
It’s now been heralded by Channel 4 as its “most binged new series ever”.
ADVERTISEMENT
But it’s the show’s final episode, in which Valerie Tozer – played by Keeley Hawes – the mum of Olly Alexander’s character Ritchie, “goes on the warpath” as terrible confrontations are made, that has proved to be the one to rip the nation’s hearts out.
During an online panel discussion for BFI at Home, Keeley described Valerie as “a complicated but, at the same time, she’s incredibly straight-forward character,” but it admitted that it was the last episode in particular that really sold the show to her when she was given the scripts to read.
For weeks, fans of the show on social media have been debating why an actor of Keeley Hawes’ stature and experience would accept a role as supporting as this one.
ADVERTISEMENT
But they finally figured out why once the final episode aired.
Keeley said: “I got a message from my agent saying the first four scripts were on the way but to keep going because even though I was only in a handful of scenes, I’d be in a lot of episode five,
“Even on the strength of the handful of scenes I would have wanted to be part of it, but then came episode five and it was amazing. I couldn’t believe my luck. It’s such an interesting period of time that hasn’t really been done in this way.”
In fact, just reading the scripts proved to be an emotional experience for Keeley.
“They were so real,” she explains.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I sat and read every episode, one after the other, and laughed and sobbed. I find the sadness of it hard to talk about, even now.
“It has become apparent that I can’t talk about this show without crying.”
Channel 4 / All 4
But despite the emotional impact of the show and the challenges that such an element brought with it, both during and after filming, Keeley admits it was still very much a rewarding and “glorious” shoot.
Filming also allowed Keeley to tap into some of her own personal experiences of the era, particularly in regard to HIV and AIDS, with her admitting: I grew up very close to St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington where there was an HIV wing – I think it was one of the first ones at the time,
“I remember walking past that quite often and feeling a sense of foreboding.
ADVERTISEMENT
“A teacher at my primary school, when I was a bit older, went away and was ill and died of AIDS but it wasn’t something people wanted to say out loud. Nobody wanted to put a name to it, he was just ‘unwell’. It all came flooding back. I grew up in that decade and feel quite sentimental about it, but I wouldn’t want to relive it.”
When asked what she hopes audiences will take away from the show, Keeley says she wants it to educate people who weren’t around at the time.
“I don’t think my 20-year-old son has much idea about this,” she explains.
“It’s not something studied in schools because HIV is something you live with, you don’t die from it in the same way, it’s not a death sentence, so I think it will act as a reminder to some or even be news to younger generations”.
Channel 4 / All 4
And, she also believes that the timing of the show – airing in the middle of England’s third national lockdown amid the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic – has been “accidentally extraordinary”, saying: “People say we’ve never lived through anything like this COVID pandemic but we have.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The way people were treated before they knew what AIDS was, the alienation of those people who were suffering in isolation, people with PPE and so on, all the conspiracy theories about a gay cancer.
“There are so many parallels to now, before we got a clearer understanding of COVID.
“I follow this brilliant Instagram page called The AIDS Memorial [@theaidsmemorial] and everyday, people post pictures of people they’ve lost with the hashtag #whatisrememberedlives – each and every story is different, from the 80s to the present day.
“Reading them makes all the lives in It’s A Sin feel more real, because some of them are so similar and they’re people that deserve to be remembered.”
___
You can watch all five episodes of It’s A Sin on All 4 here.
Trending
Package holiday company launches new ‘Beckham Clause’ for feuding families
Emily Sergeant
A popular package holiday company has launched a new ‘Beckham Clause’ to help protect feuding families.
It’s official… family fallouts are now holiday-proof, thanks to a new ‘Beckham Clause’ that’s been launched by a Manchester-based travel company On The Beach in the wake of the ongoing – and at this point, inescapable – Beckham family feud.
In case you need bringing up to speed, then allow us to (briefly) sum up the Beckham family drama for you as best as possible.
Basically, at the centre of this discourse the eldest Beckham child, Brooklyn, his wife Nicola Peltz, and primarily his mum Victoria, although as the months have gone on, it appears there’s no member of the Beckham family that isn’t somewhat involved (okay, maybe not Harper… well at least not publicly, anyway).
Earlier this month, it was reported that Brooklyn had become estranged from his family, and had told his parents to contact him only through lawyers.
On The Beach has launched a new ‘Beckham Clause’ for feuding families / Credit: Ivan Shimko | Natalya Zaritskaya (via Unsplash)
And then yesterday, of course, Brooklyn publicly spoke out about the accusations on his Instagram Stories for the first time ever… and all hell broke loose in the celebrity news world.
On the Beach’s new clause – officially titled the Family Fallout Refund, and already nicknamed the ‘Beckham Clause’ by bosses – aims to give holidaymakers peace of mind that no matter how messy things get at home, their getaway won’t suffer, as it applies to family holidays where one member suddenly drops out due to a feud, argument, or full-blown emotional meltdown.
Under the new policy, if a family member pulls out before departure, their share of the hotel booking will be refunded rather than leaving the rest of the group to foot the bill.
Family fallouts aren’t just limited to celebrities, every year hundreds of holiday bookings need amending due to feuds, On The Beach said, which is why it’s chosen to launch the new refund scheme.
“We love family holidays, but we’re also very aware that family fallouts cam hamper plans,” explained Zoe Harris, who is the Chief Customer Officer at On the Beach.
“The ‘Beckham Clause’ is there for those moments when someone decides they’d rather cool off at home than by the pool.
“Our new perk means that if a family feud takes place and one person drops out, the rest of the group can still head off, relax, and enjoy the holiday they were looking forward to.”
Former Chelsea midfielder reportedly linked with late move to Manchester United
Danny Jones
Manchester United are rumoured to have been linked with former Chelsea midfielder and England international, Ruben Loftus-Cheek.
With not long left of the January transfer window, however, a decision would need to be made soon if the deal stands a chance of being completed.
Loftus-Cheek, who came through the Chelsea youth system before being loaned to Crystal Palace and Fulham, now plays for Italian giants AC Milan.
Having spent a couple of years in Serie A now, he had a very solid debut campaign – scoring 10 times and registering a couple of assists in four appearances whilst helping dictate from deep – but it now looks like his time at the club could be ending, with Man United floated as a potential next destination.
🚨 | Manchester United have been offered the chance to sign Ruben Loftus-Cheek.
United are considering signing a midfielder on loan to bolster their hopes of Champions League qualification.
That’s according to sports journalist Alex Crook, anyway, who claims that the Red Devils have been given the chance to sign the 29-year-old before the end of the month.
As per the update via talkSPORT, the chief football correspondent claims that United are debating bringing in another option in the middle of the park on loan, at the very least, as they chase down a return to Europe next season, and Loftus-Cheek is one of the names that has been linked with a move.
He explains that “talks are only exploratory at this stage, but Loftus-Cheek is keen to return to the Premier League”; the Lewisham-born central midfielder has struggled to gain regular minutes and have the same impact so far this term.
It remains to be seen just how much interest there is on Man United‘s end, but if the reports are to be believed, the opportunity looks to be there.
Crook goes on to add that INEOS are also thought to be exploring a deal for ex-Leicester City and previous MUFC transfer target, Wilfred Ndidi.
Having left the Premier League back last year after the best of seven years with the Foxes, Ndidi is currently captain not only at Beşiktaş, as well as his national team, Nigeria, who just reached the AFCON semi-finals.
It is believed that he wants a return to English football for both career prospects and ‘family reasons’.
Now 29 and nearly a whole decade on from first being linked with him during his time at Genk, many supporters have reacted by stating that he should have been recreated years ago, and that potentially turning to older shortlisted names on a temporary contract isn’t the right direction for the club.
Do you see either of these players being brought in and/or working out at Old Trafford, Reds?