Leading names within the night time economy sector are demanding “urgent additional clarity” in reaction to yesterday’s roadmap announcement.
In a direct address to the nation, coming just over seven weeks after the reintroducing of national restrictions in England for a third time amid the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and ahead of Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget arriving next week, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has officially announced the government’s roadmap to take the country out of lockdown.
The roadmap will see the economy reopen over a number of weeks, lifting measures for separate sectors at four different stages.
Mr Johnson claimed that this exit strategy was designed in such a way as to be “irreversible”.
Providing the government deems it safe enough to do so when the time arrives, Greater Manchester’s hard-hit hospitality industry has been given the green light to begin reopening under the ‘rule of six’ from no earlier than 12th April, by starting with outdoor dining and drinking, before moving indoors on 17th May.
ADVERTISEMENT
But for the night time economy sector – the fifth biggest industry in the UK – reopening to the public will not be permitted until all social restrictions are predicted to be lifted by 21st June at the earliest.
The streets of Manchester city centre and the borough’s towns are usually teeming with revellers on any given weekend, but the roadmap announcement means that we’ll have to wait a good few months before we’re met with that familiar hustle and bustle once again.
ADVERTISEMENT
It also means that, by the time of predicted reopening, nightclubs and concert halls across the region will have been closed for in excess of 455 days.
It’s this continued shut-down of the sector that has prompted a reaction by many industry figures.
Michael Kill, CEO – “We are pleased to hear within the Prime Minister’s statement the inclusion of a timeline for night time economy businesses, in particular some of the hardest hit businesses, many of which have been closed since March 2020, like nightclubs, bars and casinos” pic.twitter.com/KxcjG3qPLK
Michael Kill – CEO of the Night Time Industries Association (NTIA) – has responded to the unveiling of the roadmap with a stark warning, saying that: “[Although] we are pleased to hear within the Prime Minister’s statement the inclusion of a timeline for night time economy businesses, in particular some of the hardest hit businesses, many of which have been closed since March 2020, like nightclubs, bars and casinos.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Despite this, our evidence suggests that 85% of those who work in the night time economy are considering leaving the sector.
“The sector urgently needs additional clarity on reopening and critical financial support from the Chancellor if we are to avoid economic and social damage that will last a generation.”
The Music Venue Trust took to social media to echo a similar sentiment, stating that: “We warmly welcome the government’s acknowledgement of the value of nightlife, committing to not reinstating a curfew and including nightclubs within the reopening timetable [but] we note that this road map to reopening once again singles out live performance events as a specific risk which require that the sector is treated in a special way.
“Since March 2020, we have consistently stated that, if this is the case, then it is logical that the government will choose to address that status with sector-specific financial support to mitigate the damage being done to businesses and people’s lives, careers and families.
“In light of the announcement, the Budget next week must clearly lay out exactly how the government is going to provide that sector-specific support”.
ADVERTISEMENT
We note that this road map to reopening once again singles out live performance events as a specific risk which require that the sector is treated in a special way.
In light of today's announcements, the Budget next week must clearly lay out exactly how the government is going to provide that sector-specific support. @RishiSunak
Here in the North West region, the government’s roadmap unveiling was met with reaction by Sacha Lord – Greater Manchester’s Night Time Economy Adviser, and co-founder of Warehouse Project and Parklife – who, after continuing to remain at the forefront of the fight to save the industry over the past 11 months, took to Twitter to give his thoughts.
Mr Lord mainly expressed anxiousness surrounding the wait until Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget announcement on 3rd March.
He said: “The vast majority of pubs in deprived areas do not have beer gardens. It’s a luxury reserved for middle class areas who have the space and financials, so once again, the working class are hardest hit and I urge the government to actually visit the North to see for themselves.
“We need urgent clarity on the financial support operators will have.
“We can’t afford to wait for the Budget in 10 days [as there’ll be] huge implications on mental health for owners and employees while they wait in limbo to find out if they can financially survive and keep their livelihoods.
ADVERTISEMENT
Vast majority of pubs in deprived areas do not have beer gardens. It's a luxury reserved for middle class areas who have the space & financials. Once again, the working class are hardest hit.
I urge the Government to actually visit the North to see for themselves!
We need urgent clarity on the financial support operators will have. We can't afford to wait for the Budget in 10 days.
Huge implications on mental health for owners and employees while they wait in limbo to find out if they can financially survive and keep their livelihoods.
He continued: “If it’s about ‘data not dates’, I see no reason why indoor hospitality can’t reopen at the same time as non-essential retail. I’d strongly argue hospitality is safer. We still have no data to confirm hospitality is a high risk area of transmission, so how is it justified?
“For the operators who can trade outdoors, breaking even is not a possibility.
“They cannot pay rents, rates and bills or afford to take staff off furlough if they are only serving to 10% capacity, and many will simply choose not to reopen.”
He closed out his Twitter statement by agreeing with caution, questioning the logic of the dates provided.
Caution is the right approach for the long term, but:
12th April I will be able to drive into town, go shopping all day, have a haircut on the way home, then swing by Sainsburys to pick up my dinner.
I won't be able to sit in Pret and have a sandwich for lunch.
The government’s intentions for the night time economy and hospitality sector set out within its roadmap come after ongoing economic struggles, several devastating permanent closures, and a long, hard fight by business owners and industry names – as well as the forming of an All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in December – that inevitably arose as a result of long-term shut-down.
ADVERTISEMENT
And these intentions also come after the Night Time Industries Association (NTIA) was left with no choice but to issue a stark warning to the government last month, with the body urging government ministers to provide further financial support to nightclubs.
It followed the worrying reveal that 75% of clubs could face serious hardship and even “extinction” during the third national lockdown.
The NTIA is calling on the UK government for:
Late Night Economy Sector specific support for the hardest-hit businesses in terms of grants.
Extend the VAT cut to 5% for a further 12 months, encompassing a broader part of the sector.
Extension of Business Rates Holiday until end of 2021.
Extend the repayment and interest free period for all government-backed loan initiatives.
Extend CJRS / SEISS until the end of 2021 – allowing flexible furlough.
Defer Tax Payments to December 2021 – allowing for full trading engagement before debts fall.
Resolution to the Commercial Rents issues currently, which will be pivotal once the FM runs out at the end of March.
You can find out more about the ongoing #LastToOpenFirstToKnow fight via the NTIA wesbite.
News
Manchester United announce record revenue despite on-pitch struggles
Danny Jones
Manchester United have declared a record revenue figure for the full 2025 fiscal term, even with their poor performances on the pitch over the past 12 months.
They may still be a continually struggling Premier League side who seem to be in a perpetual state of transition, but they remain nothing short of a global giant in terms of sporting brands.
Yes, despite Man United recording two of the worst finishes in domestic history in the previous two campaigns and head coach Ruben Amorim having already overseen the worst start to a top-flight season in the modern era following the defeat on derby day, the football club has reached a monetary milestone.
According to their official reports for the fourth and final quarter of the financial year, they brought in a record-breaking £666.5 million throughout 2024/25 – but, as always, it’s more complicated than that.
"There are some tough decisions to be made"
BREAKING: Manchester United have announced record revenues for 2024/25 of £666.5m – but the club still made an overall loss of £33m 🚨 pic.twitter.com/jlQS7SMjJ8
Released on Wednesday, 17 September, Manchester United PLC confirmed that they had managed to record the biggest revenue figures on several fronts despite crashing out of the Europa League, finishing 15th in the table overall and failing to secure a place in any European competition this season.
The first half of Amorim‘s tenure at Old Trafford saw the club’s worst competitive placing since 1973/74, a.k.a. the last time the Red Devils were relegated from the first division.
Nevertheless, a fresh shirt sponsorship agreement with Snapdragon, new brand partnerships with the likes of Coca-Cola, an extension of their contract with travel experience company, SportsBreaks, and numerous other deals saw United achieve a record commercial revenue of £333.3m.
Elsewhere, match revenue was also up and reached new heights, tallying approximately £160.3m in the 12 months leading up to 30 June 2025 – the most they have ever registered when it comes to ticket sales, concessions, and other transactions in and around game days.
Although this number is a reduction of more than 70.8% what they lost last year (£113.2m), there is still plenty of concern among supporters over how money is still not only being spent but moved around.
Co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the INEOS board did pay sizeable chunks of MUFC’s debt, which has piled up at an alarming rate in the two decades since the Glazer takeover, but there has still been plenty of borrowing.
In addition to a number of shorter-term loans, there has also been an increased level of amortisation and significant transfer spending this summer, despite being admittedly cash-strapped.
As well as actually having less money to play with over the past 12 months, they are also set to receive less in TV rights and broadcasting revenues this season due to not making it into any European competition, hence why they went on a post-season Asian tour to try and make up for funds lost.
It’s estimated that the business earned a further £8 million from these games, but it’s also worth noting that significant sums have been spent not only on new signings but also on severance fees and redundancy packages, so it’s hard to assess how much this extra injection helped with the fine margins.
While it's good to see that we're paying down our long-term debts, I'm a bit worried about how the club have maybe over-leveraged short-term borrowings. Debt restructure needed imo. pic.twitter.com/LQuUdbzK1h
Divisive CEO and former City Football Group exec, Omar Berrada, wrote in the comments section of the full findings and financial report: “As we settle into the 2025/26 season, we are working hard to improve the club in all areas.
“On the field, we are pleased with the additions we have made to our men’s and women’s first team squads over the summer, as we build for the long term. Off the field, we are emerging from a period of structural and leadership change with a refreshed, streamlined organisation equipped to deliver on our sporting and commercial objectives.”
He adds: “We are also investing [in upgrading] our infrastructure, including completion of the £50m redevelopment of our men’s first team building at Carrington, on time and on budget, following prior investment in our women’s team facilities, to create a world-class environment for our players and staff.
“Meanwhile, planning continues to meet our ambition of developing a new stadium at Old Trafford as part of a transformational regeneration of the surrounding community.
Total Manchester United revenue may be up but they’re about to shell out seismic outlay for their new stadium costs.
Berrada signs off by insistig that for the club to have “generated record revenues during such a challenging year for the club demonstrates the resilience which is a hallmark of Manchester United.
“Our commercial business remains strong as we continue to deliver appealing products and experiences for our fans, and best-in-class value to our partners.”
“As we start to feel the benefits of our cost reduction programme, there is significant potential for improved financial performance, which will, in turn, support our overriding priority: success on the pitch.”
What do you make of Manchester United’s 2024/25 annual report and how it fits into the wider picture/struggles elsewhere around the club?
FIFA confirm new changes to international breaks – and many fans are divided
Danny Jones
Global sporting body FIFA have announced new changes to the annual football calendar and the ever-divisive international breaks, specifically.
It’s fair to say that not everyone is in agreement over the update to what many fans and even players already find a frustrating format.
Put simply, FIFA have revealed that they will be merging the traditional September and October breaks into one extended period of international football from 2026 onwards.
Once again, although the decision has been met with plenty of support, it has also faced just as much, if not potentially even more, resistance.
That's well better. Always thought instead of having 3 short international breaks in autumn we'd be better off having one long one
As detailed by multiple outlets following full confirmation on Monday, 13 September, footy fans are now looking at a combined 16 days of watching national teams in World Cup qualifiers and other fixtures.
While other clubs further down the footballing pyramid will still be able to watch their team, supporters of Premier League sides and several other divisions will see domestic action cease for roughly three weeks when taking into account rest days between international and club fixtures
Besides incorporating more teams into this year’s World Cup (now a 48-team affair) and the still relatively recent advent of the Nations League – which UEFA introduced in the hopes of creating more interest in the much-maligned international breaks – this is one of the biggest changes in some time.
At present, there are typically four breaks: September, October, November and March/April – not including major tournaments themselves.
One criticism of this format has been the stop-start consequence it has on club football, and indeed, struggling to create any real momentum and/or excitement, as well as the impact on form it sometimes has on players both away on national team duty and when they get back to their clubs.
I suppose it’s better than having two different breaks in Sept and the October, and the stop start nature of the club season.
Another big concern these breaks have always been met with is the added risk of fatigue and injury.
Despite being athletes who regularly train to remain at the peak of their physical fitness, the increasingly congested fixture calendar – particularly for those playing in England, with multiple cup competitions, the prospect of European football AND no break over Christmas – continues to push bodies to the limit.
Once again, these new changes to international breaks won’t come into effect until next year, but there are plenty of pros and cons that professionals and supporters alike will continue to debate until the new schedule is implemented.