Leading names within the night time economy sector are demanding “urgent additional clarity” in reaction to yesterday’s roadmap announcement.
In a direct address to the nation, coming just over seven weeks after the reintroducing of national restrictions in England for a third time amid the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and ahead of Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget arriving next week, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has officially announced the government’s roadmap to take the country out of lockdown.
The roadmap will see the economy reopen over a number of weeks, lifting measures for separate sectors at four different stages.
Mr Johnson claimed that this exit strategy was designed in such a way as to be “irreversible”.
Providing the government deems it safe enough to do so when the time arrives, Greater Manchester’s hard-hit hospitality industry has been given the green light to begin reopening under the ‘rule of six’ from no earlier than 12th April, by starting with outdoor dining and drinking, before moving indoors on 17th May.
ADVERTISEMENT
But for the night time economy sector – the fifth biggest industry in the UK – reopening to the public will not be permitted until all social restrictions are predicted to be lifted by 21st June at the earliest.
The streets of Manchester city centre and the borough’s towns are usually teeming with revellers on any given weekend, but the roadmap announcement means that we’ll have to wait a good few months before we’re met with that familiar hustle and bustle once again.
ADVERTISEMENT
It also means that, by the time of predicted reopening, nightclubs and concert halls across the region will have been closed for in excess of 455 days.
It’s this continued shut-down of the sector that has prompted a reaction by many industry figures.
Michael Kill, CEO – “We are pleased to hear within the Prime Minister’s statement the inclusion of a timeline for night time economy businesses, in particular some of the hardest hit businesses, many of which have been closed since March 2020, like nightclubs, bars and casinos” pic.twitter.com/KxcjG3qPLK
Michael Kill – CEO of the Night Time Industries Association (NTIA) – has responded to the unveiling of the roadmap with a stark warning, saying that: “[Although] we are pleased to hear within the Prime Minister’s statement the inclusion of a timeline for night time economy businesses, in particular some of the hardest hit businesses, many of which have been closed since March 2020, like nightclubs, bars and casinos.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Despite this, our evidence suggests that 85% of those who work in the night time economy are considering leaving the sector.
“The sector urgently needs additional clarity on reopening and critical financial support from the Chancellor if we are to avoid economic and social damage that will last a generation.”
The Music Venue Trust took to social media to echo a similar sentiment, stating that: “We warmly welcome the government’s acknowledgement of the value of nightlife, committing to not reinstating a curfew and including nightclubs within the reopening timetable [but] we note that this road map to reopening once again singles out live performance events as a specific risk which require that the sector is treated in a special way.
“Since March 2020, we have consistently stated that, if this is the case, then it is logical that the government will choose to address that status with sector-specific financial support to mitigate the damage being done to businesses and people’s lives, careers and families.
“In light of the announcement, the Budget next week must clearly lay out exactly how the government is going to provide that sector-specific support”.
ADVERTISEMENT
We note that this road map to reopening once again singles out live performance events as a specific risk which require that the sector is treated in a special way.
In light of today's announcements, the Budget next week must clearly lay out exactly how the government is going to provide that sector-specific support. @RishiSunak
Here in the North West region, the government’s roadmap unveiling was met with reaction by Sacha Lord – Greater Manchester’s Night Time Economy Adviser, and co-founder of Warehouse Project and Parklife – who, after continuing to remain at the forefront of the fight to save the industry over the past 11 months, took to Twitter to give his thoughts.
Mr Lord mainly expressed anxiousness surrounding the wait until Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget announcement on 3rd March.
He said: “The vast majority of pubs in deprived areas do not have beer gardens. It’s a luxury reserved for middle class areas who have the space and financials, so once again, the working class are hardest hit and I urge the government to actually visit the North to see for themselves.
“We need urgent clarity on the financial support operators will have.
“We can’t afford to wait for the Budget in 10 days [as there’ll be] huge implications on mental health for owners and employees while they wait in limbo to find out if they can financially survive and keep their livelihoods.
ADVERTISEMENT
Vast majority of pubs in deprived areas do not have beer gardens. It's a luxury reserved for middle class areas who have the space & financials. Once again, the working class are hardest hit.
I urge the Government to actually visit the North to see for themselves!
We need urgent clarity on the financial support operators will have. We can't afford to wait for the Budget in 10 days.
Huge implications on mental health for owners and employees while they wait in limbo to find out if they can financially survive and keep their livelihoods.
He continued: “If it’s about ‘data not dates’, I see no reason why indoor hospitality can’t reopen at the same time as non-essential retail. I’d strongly argue hospitality is safer. We still have no data to confirm hospitality is a high risk area of transmission, so how is it justified?
“For the operators who can trade outdoors, breaking even is not a possibility.
“They cannot pay rents, rates and bills or afford to take staff off furlough if they are only serving to 10% capacity, and many will simply choose not to reopen.”
He closed out his Twitter statement by agreeing with caution, questioning the logic of the dates provided.
Caution is the right approach for the long term, but:
12th April I will be able to drive into town, go shopping all day, have a haircut on the way home, then swing by Sainsburys to pick up my dinner.
I won't be able to sit in Pret and have a sandwich for lunch.
The government’s intentions for the night time economy and hospitality sector set out within its roadmap come after ongoing economic struggles, several devastating permanent closures, and a long, hard fight by business owners and industry names – as well as the forming of an All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in December – that inevitably arose as a result of long-term shut-down.
ADVERTISEMENT
And these intentions also come after the Night Time Industries Association (NTIA) was left with no choice but to issue a stark warning to the government last month, with the body urging government ministers to provide further financial support to nightclubs.
It followed the worrying reveal that 75% of clubs could face serious hardship and even “extinction” during the third national lockdown.
The NTIA is calling on the UK government for:
Late Night Economy Sector specific support for the hardest-hit businesses in terms of grants.
Extend the VAT cut to 5% for a further 12 months, encompassing a broader part of the sector.
Extension of Business Rates Holiday until end of 2021.
Extend the repayment and interest free period for all government-backed loan initiatives.
Extend CJRS / SEISS until the end of 2021 – allowing flexible furlough.
Defer Tax Payments to December 2021 – allowing for full trading engagement before debts fall.
Resolution to the Commercial Rents issues currently, which will be pivotal once the FM runs out at the end of March.
You can find out more about the ongoing #LastToOpenFirstToKnow fight via the NTIA wesbite.
News
Breakaway competition R360 issues statement after rubgy unions warn players of sanctions
Danny Jones
Prospective breakaway competition R360 have issued a response to the joint statement from multiple countries’ rugby unions, which has warned players of sanctions should they choose to join the new league.
While the vast majority seemingly remain opposed to the new concept, backing from certain key figures has resulted in the likes of the UK and Irish rugby unions, along with other key nations, sharing their unified stance against the potential rival.
Put in the simplest terms, the R360 model is rugby’s equivalent of what the proposed European ‘Super League’ was for football just a few years ago, with similar questions being raised around how it could jeopardise existing contests, player wellbeing and more.
Now, though, the new format – which has been largely backed and developed by former World Cup winner with England, Mike Tindall – delivered its own reply on Wednesday, 8 October.
Shared publicly to the press, the alternative tournament wrote: “It’s not always easy to embrace new opportunities, but as we’ve seen throughout history, it’s essential for any sport to grow. So many players love what R360 can do for them and the game, and we can’t wait to kick off next year.
“Player welfare is one of the key reasons for creating our global series, which will greatly reduce player load and capture the attention of a new generation of fans globally. We want to work collaboratively as part of the global rugby calendar.
“The series is designed with bespoke schedules for men’s and women’s teams and R360 will release all players for international matches, as written into their contracts. Our philosophy is clear – if players want to play for their country, they should have that opportunity. Why would the unions stand in their way?
“We look forward to submitting to the World Rugby Council for sanctioning next summer as planned.”
At present, R360 is due to hold its inagural season this time next year, with eight new male teams and four women’s sides expected to get underway from October 2026 onwards.
In addition to more lucrative contracts like those promised in the IPL (Indian Premier League) cricket, LIV Golf and the aforementioned albeit failed Super League, R360 is also set to offer a reduced playing schedule but one that would still tempt athletes away from their current teams to new franchises.
The national rugby unions of New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Ireland, England, Scotland, France and Italy have released the following statement on the proposed R360 competition ⬇️#IrishRugby
Although they have assured player care is an utmost priority, their health and fitness is one of my concerns put forward by the total eight rubgy unions who have urged current pros to stay away from the breakaway competition.
In case you haven’t seen the statement release by England, Ireland and Scotland, as well as France, Italy, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, it begins by “urging extreme caution for players and support staff considering joining the proposed R360 competition.”
Assuring that they welcome “investment and innovation in rugby”, they feel this particular idea won’t improve the sport but could instead “fragment or weaken it.”
Having assessed the proposals supposed value/addition to the “rugby’s global ecosystem”, it seems the fear is that the outcome will be a “net negative to the game”, with little to no detail as to how it can run alongside existing fixtures, assure proper management of player welfare and more.
As for Wales, despite opting not to put their name to the open letter itself, they have stated publicly: “The Welsh Rugby Union supports this statement, and we’re considering changes we may need to make to qualification rules in Wales as part of ongoing analysis following our recent consultation process.”
The statement continues: “The R360 model, as outlined publicly, rather appears designed to generate profits and return them to a very small elite, potentially hollowing out the investment that national unions and existing leagues make in community rugby, player development, and participation pathways.”
It seems there is deep concern for how it could affect grassroots and the international rugby too, not just league and union, and have failed to full explain or help key organisations “better understand their business and operating model.”
Most notably, they sign off by adding: “Each of the national unions will therefore be advising men’s and women’s players that participation in R360 would make them ineligible for international selection.”
What do you make of the whole debate – do you like the current schedule/format as it is, or do you think there’s room for a new chapter in the rugby world?
Passengers warned of ‘disruption’ ahead of more Bee Network bus strikes this weekend
Emily Sergeant
Bus services across Greater Manchester will be disrupted later this weekend as drivers from two companies stage strike action.
In what is the latest chapter in a long-running dispute, Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) says it has had confirmation that staff from two operators, Stagecoach and Metroline, will go ahead with further planned strikes this weekend.
If this is the first you’re hearing of the upcoming industrial action, 2,000 workers who were employed by Stagecoach, Metroline Manchester, and First Bus Rochdale – each of which are firms among those that make up the bus part of the Bee Network – walked out in a number of co-ordinated strikes earlier this month amid an ongoing pay dispute.
Unite the Union said each of the firms are ‘highly profitable’ and it’s therefore ‘disappointing’ that workers are being denied a fair wage.
In this case, Unite has confirmed that drivers at First have called off further action after voting to accept a revised pay offer.
Passengers are being warned of ‘disruption’ ahead of more Bee Network bus strikes this weekend / Credit: TfGM
However, both Stagecoach and Metroline staff have opted to proceed with strike action onFriday 10 October, Saturday 11 October, and Monday 13 October.
This means that around 190 services, including some dedicated school buses, will not run on strike days, and TfGM is therefore advising everyone to ‘check before they travel’ and allow extra time to make their journey.
Bus services in Tameside, Trafford, and Stockport are not expected to run, and some services in South Manchester, parts of the city centre, and Rochdale will also be impacted.
Many bus services will continue to run ‘as usual’, however, and this includes services such as the Free Bus in Manchester city centre, as well as the majority of buses in Bolton, Bury, Salford, and Wigan.
The strikes are the latest in an ongoing dispute over pay / Credit: TfGM
“While we are pleased that planned industrial action by First staff has been called off, we encourage Stagecoach, Metroline, and Unite to continue discussions to avert further strike action,” commented Danny Vaughan, who is the Chief Network Officer at TfGM.
“We’ll continue to keep passengers informed and support them to make journeys wherever possible. We encourage everyone to check the latest status of their service before they travel, leave plenty of time for their journey and to get in touch if they have any questions.”
Unite has indicated that further industrial action will also happen on Saturday 18, Thursday 23 and Friday 24 October.